Progressive Tile Arrangements
Study the MYP Criteria B and C tile arrangement investigation in Extended Geometry Year 5. Pattern generalisation, algebraic formulae, and geometric justification guidance.
What This Investigation Is About
Progressive Tile Arrangements is a Criterion B and C investigation task set in a geometric context. Students examine a growing arrangement of tiles — typically on a 2D grid — where each stage follows a consistent rule. They analyse how the arrangement grows, find a general formula, and communicate their findings with precision and mathematical justification.
The Geometric Context
Unlike a purely numerical sequence, tile arrangement investigations have a visual structure that students can exploit. The shape of the arrangement at each stage — whether it forms an L, a cross, a bordered square, or a staircase — connects directly to the algebraic formula. Students who use the geometry to explain the formula score more highly on both Criterion B and Criterion C.
What the Investigation Involves
- Observing and drawing the first several stages of the tile arrangement
- Counting tiles by category (border tiles, interior tiles, total tiles) systematically
- Identifying linear, quadratic, or other relationships between stage number and tile count
- Writing a general formula and verifying it for stages not drawn
- Justifying the formula by referring to the geometric structure — for example, explaining why a quadratic term arises from the area of an expanding square region
Criterion B: Investigating Patterns
A strong Criterion B response identifies patterns beyond the obvious, forms a precise conjecture with correct algebraic notation, and provides a justification that goes beyond testing cases. Students should explain why the pattern holds, connecting it to the geometry of the arrangement.
Criterion C: Communicating
Criterion C assesses the clarity and precision of the mathematical communication. Students should use correct notation, organise their response logically, label diagrams clearly, and write explanations that a reader unfamiliar with the task could follow.
Common Weaknesses in Student Responses
- Listing values without organising them in a table — making it difficult to spot and justify the pattern
- Finding a formula by trial and error without justifying its structure geometrically
- Using informal language ("it keeps going up by 4 each time") without converting this to algebraic form
- Not verifying the formula with an independent stage before claiming it is general
- Poor diagram labelling that makes it unclear which tiles are being counted
Practice Approach
Practise drawing and counting tile arrangements neatly and systematically. Organise data in a table with columns for stage number, tile count, first difference, and second difference — this reveals whether the relationship is linear or quadratic. Then work on writing the geometric explanation alongside the algebraic formula, as this is what distinguishes a high-scoring response from a correct-but-unexplained one.