Data-driven advocacy that reinstated Humanities stream at our school
Our school discontinued Arts stream 3 years ago—only Science and Commerce offered for Grades 11-12. Students interested in History, Political Science, Psychology, Literature had no options. Many left for other schools. Administration said there was 'no demand,' but they never actually asked students. I believed demand existed but was invisible without data.
Led data-driven campaign to reinstate Arts stream: (1) Surveyed 245 students—42% wanted Arts if available (2) Researched peer schools—12/15 similar schools offer Arts (3) Documented existing resources—8 Arts-qualified teachers already employed, zero infrastructure cost (4) Built student-parent coalition—387 signatures (5) Professional presentation to school board. Result: Arts stream reinstated starting next year. 37 students already enrolled. Proof that student advocacy works when backed by evidence.
fighting the system: Class 9 subject selection - wanted Arts stream. counselor literally laughed. "You got 92% in science. Why waste your potential?" parents panicked. relatives called it "career suicide". the STIGMA is real. talked to 47 students secretly considering Arts - all hiding it, all ashamed. this is INSANE. researched: Arts students → journalism, law, civil services, psychology, design, advertising (all high-paying!). collected data from 200 students across 3 schools. 78% pressured into Science against interest. of those, 62% performed WORSE due to lack of motivation. started petition + Instagram campaign. 340 signatures. presented to principal with hard data: forced Science students have 23% lower performance vs interest-based choices. principal updated counseling policy! now students get neutral guidance. 18 kids took Arts this year vs 3 last year. fighting stereotypes with facts. your stream doesn't define your worth. 📚✊
245-student survey proving 42% demand for Arts stream
Benchmarking against 15 peer schools to show Arts is standard offering
Multi-stakeholder alliance of students, parents, supportive teachers
20-slide presentation to school board with data visualization
Realized Arts discontinuation was policy decision, not student choice. School claimed "no demand" but had never surveyed students. Hypothesis: demand exists but is unmeasured. If we prove demand with data, school might reconsider.
Student survey (n=245): "If Arts stream available, would you choose it? Why/why not?" 42% said yes. Peer school analysis: contacted 15 similar schools, 12 offer Arts. Resource audit: counted Arts-qualified teachers (8), estimated costs (₹0 additional). Built comprehensive evidence base.
Framed as opportunity, not criticism: "Help 42% of students pursue their passion." Highlighted existing resources (no budget ask). Addressed concerns preemptively (Arts alumni success data). Made saying "yes" easy for decision-makers.
Students alone = easy to dismiss. Students + parents + community = must be addressed. Parent committee letter was game-changer—school can't ignore parent voices. Learned: identify all stakeholders, activate the influential ones.
Every great project starts with a personal problem. What's yours?
Get Started